Search found 81 matches

by gforti
Yesterday, 14:48
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: CoilSolver - Normalize Coil Current
Replies: 3
Views: 79

Re: CoilSolver - Normalize Coil Current

Hey guys,

I've uploaded the files to my github and also included a pdf with some guidance to set the simulation and some results.

https://github.com/gforti84/ElmerFiles/ ... in/debug_8
by gforti
Yesterday, 05:35
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: CoilSolver - Normalize Coil Current
Replies: 3
Views: 79

Re: CoilSolver - Normalize Coil Current

Just to put a little more wood to the fire. Here is the same example, but using WPotentialSolver. I have simulated a harmonic model with the full coil, using CoilSolver, and half coil, with WSolver. Results from CoilSolver for massive coil is either divergent or VERY off. WSolver is ok, but has ZERO...
by gforti
27 May 2024, 23:25
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: CoilSolver - Normalize Coil Current
Replies: 3
Views: 79

CoilSolver - Normalize Coil Current

Hello all, I was helping a friend with CoilSolver and encoutered a few inconsistensies. First, the only way to get results from Current Density is by using the Body Force without the keyword 'Use Elemental CoilCurrent' in the AVSolver. Other options gave zero for current density and actual current v...
by gforti
08 May 2024, 06:14
Forum: General
Topic: Elmer's solution for coupling different solvers
Replies: 3
Views: 151

Elmer's solution for coupling different solvers

During a visit to an entertainment park, I saw the strategy used by Elmer for gluing different solvers.
Congrats to you all, it is a very elegant solution.
IMG20240507141859.jpg
IMG20240507141859.jpg (163.78 KiB) Viewed 149 times
by gforti
16 Apr 2024, 03:28
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 570

Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element

Hello Peter, Thanks for you response. I am reading the data through SaveLine procedure and I am getting the expected results. Actually, using Element = p:2 gets close, but best results is trough increased order elements in the mesh. I haven't checked the simulation time yet. Also, considering the si...
by gforti
10 Apr 2024, 21:30
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 570

Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element

Thanks for the response, Mika.

About the result. Shoudn't B be defined by a linear variation and not a constant value in each element?
by gforti
09 Apr 2024, 17:03
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 570

Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element

Hello all again, I saw that 'Quadratic Approximation' and 'Piola Transform' Keywords are not in the MagnetoDynamics2D solver. But they are changing the results considerably (Ps. I am using higher-order elements from ElmerGrid -increase) Is there a recomendation regarding these? Thanks again for your...
by gforti
06 Apr 2024, 15:24
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 570

Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element

PS. updated my Elmer and this problem with Quadratic approximation is solved.
by gforti
05 Apr 2024, 19:22
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 570

Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element

Also, When I use: Use Piola Transform = Logical True Quadratic Approximation = Logical True The linear system convergence is better, but it haults at the MagnetoDynamicsCalcFields. Simulation stops abruptaly. SingleSolver: Attempting to call solver: 3 SingleSolver: Solver Equation string is: calcfie...
by gforti
05 Apr 2024, 15:04
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 570

MgDyn2D and high-order element

Hello all, I am trying to simulate 2D magnetic flux distribution using higher order elements. I am trying this because I want to simulate a induction furnace applied to thin electrical steel laminations (0.27 mm). My thinking is that second-order elements would reproduce better the induced current i...