Thank you so much! That worked like a charm. I used the "Mapping Mask Name" as in test case structmap7. I have attached the updated sif for anyone who is curious.
I appreciate your help!
Search found 11 matches
- 18 Nov 2020, 23:01
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8186
- 03 Nov 2020, 01:12
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8186
Re: Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
Hi, I spent some time trying to get to get a mask for the structured mesh mapper to work, using something like Exported Variable i = string "material:ice" but it was not really clear to me to what extent I needed to do this. As a result I kept running into the error " StructuredMeshMa...
- 30 Oct 2020, 21:49
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8186
Re: Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
Hi,
I do not need a temperature jump. I will work on adding a mask to structured mesh mapper.
Thanks!
I do not need a temperature jump. I will work on adding a mask to structured mesh mapper.
Thanks!
- 29 Oct 2020, 23:52
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8186
Adding a Thermally Active Bedrock Body to a Prognostic Flowline Model
Hi all, I hope everyone is doing well and staying healthy. I would like to add a thermally active bedrock body to a prognostic flowline model. If you start with the toy glacier example given in the elmer/ice courses is there a relatively straightforward way to do this? The reason I ask is that I am ...
- 16 Jul 2020, 00:32
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11108
Re: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
Thanks for the help! The simulation works fine without the third body for the bed now.
- 01 Jul 2020, 00:34
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11108
Re: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
Hi all again, just posting to say that I appear to have resolved the problem. I made the bed a separate body as was done in the test friction heating test. If anyone has any thoughts into why this makes a difference I would be interested to hear.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- 25 Jun 2020, 02:05
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11108
Re: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
I just thought I'd post an update now that I've spent some more time on this issue. I ran the FrictionHeat test in elmerice/Tests, and I found that the frictional load user function works fine. I then ran the ArucoElmer Ice flow and temperature coupling example from the 2016 online course. This exam...
- 23 Jun 2020, 02:20
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: Spiky Ice Sheet Surface in transient flow line model
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8203
Re: Spiky Ice Sheet Surface in transient flow line model
Thanks again for all of the help. It does appear that trying to enforce a no slip boundary condition was making the problem worse. The simulations seem to run better if there is some amount of sliding allowed near the terminus.
- 23 Jun 2020, 02:16
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11108
getFrictionLoads User Function resulting in segmentation fault error
Hi all, I was working on adding frictional heating into a 2D transient ice sheet model, and when I try to evaluate the "getFrictionLoads" User function, I get thrown this error. In other words, the simulation runs fine until I attempt a model run with this additional function. TemperateIce...
- 03 Jun 2020, 19:28
- Forum: Elmer/Ice
- Topic: Spiky Ice Sheet Surface in transient flow line model
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8203
Re: Spiky Ice Sheet Surface in transient flow line model
Thanks for the timely replies. I hadn't thought about higher order elements, and I will look into that. I had reduced the time step by a factor of ten (to a tenth of a year) previously, and had no success in disappearance of the spiky surface. I will try to reduce it further to see if that helps as ...