Elmer Discussion Forum

Hello Kevin,

Thank you for the explanation, but I think this is not something I can change?

Kind regards,
Martin

Hi, I'm a bit confused now. On 25 Apr 2024, 16:16 , Peter wrote "This is not a warning". Removing the line 'Check Keywords "Warn"' doesn't help. So, probably I have to write a script to add the new keywords to SOLVER.KEYWORDS (I have a few hundred new key words). Kind regards, Ma...

Hello Peter,

I tried Max Output Level = 1 (or 0), but I still get those messages, in my case a few hundred lines.Can I use another setting?

Kind regards,
Martin

Hello Peter,

Thank you for the very fast reply. For the moment option 2 was the simplest method and it worked well!

Nice weekend!
Martin

Hi all, ElmerSolver gave an error in the case of more than 20 variables in ScalarData using masks. In my sif file, I used for the solvers: Solver 2 Equation = ScalarsDiffusiveFlux Procedure = "SaveData" "SaveScalars" Exec Solver = After Timestep Filename = flow_diffusive_flux.dat...

Hi,

Perhaps it is also possible to mention the possibility to relate a Body and a Boundary Condition section to the mesh by using the keyword Name instead of using the keywords Target Bodies and Target Boundaries.

Kind regards,
Martin Hoeijmakers

Hi,

If you are using FourierLossSolver, you may look at viewtopic.php?p=25654#p25654.

Kind regards,
Martin

Hi,

The second tip (conforming BCs) gave an improvement in speed of about 20% in my case: nice!

The third tip (removing RigidMeshMapper) gave hardly any improvement in speed (perhaps 2%). However, I have to mention that I changed MATC into LUA earlier.

Kind regards,
Martin

Hi, Peter, thanks for checking my set. I think, I found why the conforming BCs didn't work in my case. The boundaries are used in pairs. Call one boundary CW (clock wise) and the other boundary CCW (counter-clock wise). If you always use CW as the first boundary (with the keys, such as "Conform...

Hello Peter, I can understand your problem with the documentation. At this moment, I'm writing my own notes based on studying the source code. However, that is also quite a puzzle because of lack of comments, but I think it still is a good investment, as the software itself is superb. For me (and I ...