Hello All,
I have put together a "reference" case, with which to test the magnetodynamics/whitney elements solver.
Elmer project folder: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1102403/elmer_p ... ore.tar.gz
Salome study: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1102403/elmer_p ... oncore.hdf
It is a classic "iron core with airgap" case, using the following parameters:
- a linear! B-H iron core model with ur=1000
- core has outer dimensions of 10cm, 2cm "thickness"
- airgap is 1mm
- 2 turn copper coil, 4mm diameter and about 24cm long, giving about 0.38mOhm
- 0.38mV applied to coil, giving 1A current
- air cube with 50cm sides
To check the accuracy of the solver, I added a simple surface inside the iron core, so I can check the flux density or magnetic field inside the core.
From hand calculations, i expect the flux inside the core to be about 1500T (unrealistic since core is a linear model), and the mag field inside the core to be 1.5At/m.
Resistance and joule heating is calculated exactly to what I expect.
Now my questions:
1)
The solver, using the SIF file attached, gives me 2.45E-5 At/m for mag field through BC4 (my "measurement" boundary)... I expect 1.5At/m... what am I doing wrong?
2)
the SaveScalars solver also gives the identical value for "total joule heating" and "effective resistance"... I think the "joule heating" value is accidentally written twice.
Thank you for any help - much appreciated in advance!
Mike
PS:
SaveScalars output:
--------------------------------------------------------------
-2.485450933473E-005 -3.174803583010E+000 3.213939506523E+000 3.754303291024E-004 3.754303291024E-004 2.848053946269E-021 1.393910653993E-006
File started at: 2012/01/24 21:58:42
Variables in columns of matrix: magscalars.txt
1: convective flux: magnetic field strength over bc 4
2: min convective flux: magnetic field strength
3: max convective flux: magnetic field strength
4: res: total joule heating << same as 5
5: res: effective resistance << same as 4
6: res: eddy current power
7: res: magnetic field energy
--------------------------------------------------------------
PPS: pictures
2 questions - magnetodynamics / whitney elements
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4832
- Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
- Antispam: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: 2 questions - magnetodynamics / whitney elements
Hi Mike
Impressive pictures again!
I had a quick look at the scalars created by StatCurrentSolver - there was a bug. The resistance should come out now correctly. Thanx for reporting.
-Peter
Impressive pictures again!
I had a quick look at the scalars created by StatCurrentSolver - there was a bug. The resistance should come out now correctly. Thanx for reporting.
-Peter
Re: 2 questions - magnetodynamics / whitney elements
Hi Peter,
Thank you for fixing the stat current solver Bug..
any idea why the flux values dont seem to be correct?
Mike
Thank you for fixing the stat current solver Bug..
any idea why the flux values dont seem to be correct?
Mike
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4832
- Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
- Antispam: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: 2 questions - magnetodynamics / whitney elements
Hi Mike
Note that the "convective flux" gives the total integral over area. Perhaps you should divide it by the area?
-Peter
Note that the "convective flux" gives the total integral over area. Perhaps you should divide it by the area?
-Peter
Re: 2 questions - magnetodynamics / whitney elements
I still cannot get the result, but need to do some experiments first to see how we can home in on the problem.
in the meantime, the result with uCore=10 (this is realistic by the way)
in the meantime, the result with uCore=10 (this is realistic by the way)