On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractatus ... sition_6.N I did _not find
http://www.kfs.org/jonathan/witt/t62en.html
Having clear that once, I point on6.2
The propositions of mathematics are equations, and therefore pseudo-propositions.
6.21
Mathematical propositions express no thoughts.
in order to have an impression what they are saying -surely wrong- about BiCGStab,Krylov subspace methods. Used by my elmer application, btw. So, without knowing it, I need to respond to that my application bases on something unknowingly and -surely- wrong.http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/physics ... Manual.pdf
[3] Arnold D. N., Boffi D., and Falk R. S. Quadrilateral H(div) finite elements. SIAM Journal on Numerical
Analysis, 42:2429–2451, 2005.
[4] Arnold D. N., Falk R. S., and Winther R. Geometric decompositions and local bases for spaces of finite
element differential forms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198:1660–1672,
2009.
Right?
So they want me thieving for their doubtful stuff. Ok. (One might philosophize on literally any hidden motive a good deal)
I may not say that my annoyance is played.
So in the meantime I ask:
-If there is an (more,most) economic (hurray an open source copy of [4] for example cost 800€ and needs to be shipped I guess) way of learning about BiCGStab?
-And which is this way explicitly with who involved?
-In any case for an complete impression of the situation, I am interested in all that avoiding till even illegal practices. (such like thoughtlessly leaving a copy on universities toilet for reuse. - You wont do it in gated area, would you?)
-At least I would like to hear, if you think that there is considered to be a _problem within or not.?
-At least if you have personal experiences, whatever they are how you reach typically literature like this, please explicitly share it!
Any personal real world experiences fantasies or criminal stories on it welcome, I will never_ try it out again.
T I A