Page 8 of 11

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 20 Apr 2017, 12:19
by Fouzi
ok yes sure like i did with elmf90, ok thank you :)

Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 20 Apr 2017, 12:46
by Fouzi
Hi,

I start see the annimation with paraview, but i don't have the propagation it's look like a local source???help please?

Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 21 Apr 2017, 12:28
by Fouzi
Hi ,
i read this discussion:

http://elmerfem.org/forum/viewtopic.php ... 4d6#p13226

for the solvers method should i follow him or not:

Code: Select all

Solver 1

Linear System Solver = "Direct"
Linear System Direct Method = Umfpack
Steady State Convergence Tolerance = 1e-09
End
Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 25 Apr 2017, 18:07
by Fouzi
Hi

some one can help me please?

Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 11:29
by mzenker
Well, just try it and see what happens...

Matthias

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 11:30
by Fouzi
Hi,

I don't understund sorry, i try what?


Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 11:32
by Fouzi
For the momment i suspect this part is wrong:

Code: Select all

Variable Coordinate 1, Coordinate 2, Time;  Real  MATC "if (tx(0)==0.4375&tx(1)==-0.15)sin(2*pi*20000*tx(2))*(tx(2)<=0.00005);else 0;"


Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 11:41
by mzenker
Hi,

I intended to reply to your question whether or not you should use the settings proposed in the discussion you referred to in the previous post.
I don't know why your result is not what you expect. I don't have the time (and the mechanics knowledge) to check the physics of your problem and to verify if what you entered in the sif file really corresponds to what you think you have entered...
So I'm afraid you will have to check for yourself - the line of code you show seems to be a 20 kHz oscillation, is that correct?

Matthias

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 12:02
by Fouzi
yes 20khz

Fouzi

Re: Elastic wave

Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 12:28
by mzenker
Hi,

this part of your MATC expression seems strange to me:

Code: Select all

sin(2*pi*20000*tx(2))*(tx(2)<=0.00005)
What if you included the (tx(2)<=0.00005) in the if() condition?
I would play with the MATC expression to see if it changes something...

HTH,

Matthias