Hiiii,
My file is not considering damping though I have defined rayleigh damping in my file...Is there anything need to modify? The original result is also attached as jpg
Damping problem
Damping problem
- Attachments
-
- IMG-20210324-WA0005.jpg
- (106.03 KiB) Not downloaded yet
-
- case.sif
- (2.43 KiB) Downloaded 163 times
-
- undamaged.msh
- (30.51 KiB) Downloaded 163 times
-
- Posts: 2312
- Joined: 25 Jan 2019, 01:28
- Antispam: Yes
Re: Damping problem
I did some testing and it appears Rayleigh does not work with
Element = "P:2"
Element = "P:2"
Re: Damping problem
Ookk...I checked after eliminating that line...now the result is quickly coming to periodic motion after that no damping effect is there .also from.result I checked it's not showing non-linear effect..whether damping and elastic solver together doesn't work ?
- Attachments
-
- IMG-20210324-WA0011.jpg (12.4 KiB) Viewed 2545 times
-
- Posts: 2312
- Joined: 25 Jan 2019, 01:28
- Antispam: Yes
Re: Damping problem
Still doing some further testing using an earlier damping verification model I have.
-
- Posts: 2312
- Joined: 25 Jan 2019, 01:28
- Antispam: Yes
Re: Damping problem
Mika is correct. I noticed when I went back to my test case it was working. I missed that the Rayleigh Damping Beta = Real was not entered correctly. The difference with damped/undamped can be seen in the peaks of the response
- Attachments
-
- reults.png
- (106.74 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Re: Damping problem
Hiiii,
Thank you for pointing that out...But even after modifying same result I am getting as I got after eliminating the line "Element=p:2" and posted here as jpg file... Initially damping is there upto 2s approx but after that there is no effect..it's dying very fast though damping is very low in magnitude...i have attached modified sif file also...To check non-linearity displacement vs velocity plot is required..this plot will not be a smooth ellipse if it's non-linear, for linear case it will be ellipse..which I checked after 3s it's becoming either smooth ellipse or circle..
Thank you for pointing that out...But even after modifying same result I am getting as I got after eliminating the line "Element=p:2" and posted here as jpg file... Initially damping is there upto 2s approx but after that there is no effect..it's dying very fast though damping is very low in magnitude...i have attached modified sif file also...To check non-linearity displacement vs velocity plot is required..this plot will not be a smooth ellipse if it's non-linear, for linear case it will be ellipse..which I checked after 3s it's becoming either smooth ellipse or circle..
- Attachments
-
- case.sif
- (2.31 KiB) Downloaded 154 times
-
- Posts: 2312
- Joined: 25 Jan 2019, 01:28
- Antispam: Yes
Re: Damping problem
The no P2 is not a solution, the mesh is not fine enough to solve the problem without using higher order elements. use of
Element = "P:2" is a must for accuracy, or a much more refined mesh.
Element = "P:2" is a must for accuracy, or a much more refined mesh.
- Attachments
-
- results.png
- (112.77 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Re: Damping problem
In my case the problem.stilll exists, it's not showing damping effect..Was there any additional changes except element p:2 and Rayleigh Damping Beta line?It's matching completely when I compared both with and without damping...
-
- Posts: 2312
- Joined: 25 Jan 2019, 01:28
- Antispam: Yes
Re: Damping problem
Neither sif has any damping defined in the material.