Hi!
Its true that the case im working at is quite big (about 1,2 million nodes and more than 7 million FE), however the write rate of the .vtu (Binary Output) file seems too low, aprox 200-300 KB/s, so saving the 220MB results file takes too long.
Its taking almost the same time that the Solver .
Im using the 64bits version of Elmer donwloaded from sourceforge, maybe could there be some bug? or is it normal that takes this long?
ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Hi,
i think there has been some slow I/O 'features' in gfortran/gcc on windows platforms from time to time.
Any chance someone testing some case both on windows & linux (with comparable hardware) and
reporting back?
RGDS, Juha
i think there has been some slow I/O 'features' in gfortran/gcc on windows platforms from time to time.
Any chance someone testing some case both on windows & linux (with comparable hardware) and
reporting back?
RGDS, Juha
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Considering this last info and the fact that compiling under Windows is far from been easy, I will probably be testing in this same PC the CAElinux distro in the near future, if all goes smoothly, so ill report back as soon i have something.
Thanks!!
Thanks!!
Last edited by 888 on 08 Nov 2011, 16:42, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4828
- Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
- Antispam: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Hi
You might also try our tailorder Linux Mint VMWare virtual machine
http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/physics ... LinuxMint/
-Peter
You might also try our tailorder Linux Mint VMWare virtual machine
http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/physics ... LinuxMint/
-Peter
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
How that VMware version works exactly? i mean, its an standalone version or i need the virtualization software? also, how much performance penalty is expected? (avaible amount of RAM for instance, the PC has 8GB)
Im planning to run CAELinux from a USB key, writing and reading from HDD anything that isnt software.
Im planning to run CAELinux from a USB key, writing and reading from HDD anything that isnt software.
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Confirmed, using Elmer 5216 (64bits) under CAELinux the ResultOutput only take 10 seconds, againt the 5 to 10 minutes that was taking under Windows.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4828
- Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
- Antispam: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Hi
Ok, good to know.
To be on the safe side, in the current svn version the binary output is buffered (since a few days). The length of the buffer is by default the same as number of nodes.
I also recently changed the default to "binary" from "ascii" since the binary seems to work nicely, it saves time and is faster. One can still choose "Binary Output = False" or equivalently "Ascii Output = True". So if there are some problems due to these changes, I'm happy to recieve bug reports.
BR, Peter
Ok, good to know.
To be on the safe side, in the current svn version the binary output is buffered (since a few days). The length of the buffer is by default the same as number of nodes.
I also recently changed the default to "binary" from "ascii" since the binary seems to work nicely, it saves time and is faster. One can still choose "Binary Output = False" or equivalently "Ascii Output = True". So if there are some problems due to these changes, I'm happy to recieve bug reports.
BR, Peter
Re: ResultOutput in VTU too slow
Hi,
Thanks for testing Linux vs Windows! I think the windows problem can be solved
by updating the compilers. I'll do that for our build machines, hopefully this week.
Regards, Juha
Thanks for testing Linux vs Windows! I think the windows problem can be solved
by updating the compilers. I'll do that for our build machines, hopefully this week.
Regards, Juha