Search found 4832 matches
- 12 Jul 2012, 01:10
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MATC enthalpy def for phase change breaks latent heat check
- Replies: 22
- Views: 22521
Re: MATC enthalpy def for phase change breaks latent heat check
Hi I looked at the code. To me it seems that the 'spatial 2' activates the PhaseSpatial flag that is used to evalute C_p from Enthalphy inside the DiffuseConvective* assembly routine. The problem is that this is that it requires the gradient operator and hence cannot be done outside the routine wher...
- 11 Jul 2012, 18:19
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MATC enthalpy def for phase change breaks latent heat check
- Replies: 22
- Views: 22521
Re: MATC enthalpy def for phase change breaks latent heat check
Hi, Yes, you can provide the effective heat capacity yourself. However, it should be smeared over such a wide temperature interval that you get accurate enough numerical integration by the default rules. So over a few elements perhaps. -Peter
- 11 Jul 2012, 17:41
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: problem when using "Calculate Velocity = Logical True"
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6635
Re: problem when using "Calculate Velocity = Logical True"
Hi Stan Probably it is Elmer. I would guess that the problem is in deallocating the created variables. The Velocity uses for certain time integration models an existing column of the PrevValues table. My guess is that this is not properly tested for and deallocation is attempted twice. Deallocating ...
- 11 Jul 2012, 17:36
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MATC enthalpy def for phase change breaks latent heat check
- Replies: 22
- Views: 22521
Re: MATC enthalpy def for phase change breaks latent heat check
Hi
You need a phase change model since the melting heat is a delta peak for specific heat that cannot be accurately integrated with the default integration rules. See
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=971&p=3151&hilit=spatial+2#p3151
-Peter
You need a phase change model since the melting heat is a delta peak for specific heat that cannot be accurately integrated with the default integration rules. See
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=971&p=3151&hilit=spatial+2#p3151
-Peter
- 11 Jul 2012, 03:06
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Boundary Scalar Saving
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2419
Re: Boundary Scalar Saving
Hi, Solvers are executed in order of numbering if not otherwise determined by the "Exec Solver" keyword. So I think you save results before computing and get the right results for inlet because Elmer enforces by default Dirichlet conditions also for the initail guess. Now, either give Save...
- 09 Jul 2012, 17:00
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: DefaultDirichletBCs()
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1620
Re: DefaultDirichletBCs()
Yes, all will be set by DefaultDirichletBCs. Assuming that the default variable is "VarName" it operates on it, or if it is a vector, then on components "VarName i" where i=1,2,...,dofs. -Peter
- 06 Jul 2012, 01:25
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: StatElecForce - .NOT. FirstTime segmentation fault
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2748
Re: StatElecForce - .NOT. FirstTime segmentation fault
Hi
You're right. There was a bug and this testing is also rathe stupid bacause it hardly saves any time. So I removed it on the current svn version.
Thank you for reporting.
-Peter
You're right. There was a bug and this testing is also rathe stupid bacause it hardly saves any time. So I removed it on the current svn version.
Thank you for reporting.
-Peter
- 06 Jul 2012, 00:39
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: 2 Solver on 1 Variable
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2016
Re: 2 Solver on 1 Variable
Hi I've also hard time figuring what you want to do. You could solve the system hierarchically by first using StatCurrentSolver for conductors and then StatElecSolver for insulators. Then you should give them different names (both cannot be "Potential") and assign them different Equation d...
- 03 Jul 2012, 18:52
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: Help a novice to solve a simple liquid-in-solid problem
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9072
Re: Help a novice to solve a simple liquid-in-solid problem
Hi The OS workflows are not that well streamlined. Therefore when starting with simple problems I would suggest using a rather short workflow. If you look what people usually use for mesh generation you'll see that gmsh is rather popular. See: http://www.elmerfem.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=20...
- 03 Jul 2012, 18:46
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: eigenvalue problem
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4599
Re: eigenvalue problem
Hi Elasticity equation exhibits a phenomenon called locking for linear elements. Therefore it is advisable to use quadratic elements. They will give much better accuracy with the same computational cost. The easiest way to increase the accuracy is to set "Element = p:2" in the Solver (or i...