Search found 20 matches

by mb5
26 Jun 2019, 16:55
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: CoilSolver: Unlisted keywords
Replies: 7
Views: 4251

Re: CoilSolver: Unlisted keywords

kevinarden wrote: 26 Jun 2019, 11:25 It is Anisotropic not Unisotropic
Thanks, this was my fault :oops:

I still got the warning:

Code: Select all

Model Input:  Unlisted keyword: [coil conductivity fix] in section: [solver 1]]
However, this keyword has an effect on the results and seems to work correct ;)

regards
Martin
by mb5
26 Jun 2019, 08:33
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: CoilSolver: Unlisted keywords
Replies: 7
Views: 4251

Re: CoilSolver: Unlisted keywords

Hmmm,
these two keywords have no effect on the results. I proofed for an typo. There are no such keywords (or similar ones) In the SOLVER.KEYWORDS :roll:

regards
Martin
by mb5
24 Jun 2019, 17:56
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: CoilSolver: Unlisted keywords
Replies: 7
Views: 4251

CoilSolver: Unlisted keywords

Hi, I`m running tests with the CoilSolver. With this I`ve tried some keywords. It seems that some of them not working. I´m using the github code from today (2019-06-24). The keywords are documented in the ElmerModelsManual.pdf. Is it a bug or is it me? :roll: I get this error with the elmer test cas...
by mb5
20 Sep 2018, 15:59
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Inductance extraction for parallel wires
Replies: 11
Views: 7992

Re: Inductance extraction for parallel wires

Hmm, your sif file looks very complex for this simulation. There are different exitations - body force with electric potential - current density on the boundary - predefined vector potential on boundary It seems your simulation is over-determined. I would like to propose following: Remove predefined...
by mb5
13 Sep 2018, 09:10
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Inductance extraction for parallel wires
Replies: 11
Views: 7992

Re: Inductance extraction for parallel wires

Hi,

you forgot to define the body number in the body section. Try this:

Code: Select all

Body 1
  Equation = 1
  Target Bodies(1) = 7
  Material = 1
  Body Force = 1
  Initial Condition = 1
End
Regards
Martin
by mb5
04 Sep 2018, 17:05
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Lua functionality in Elmer
Replies: 6
Views: 6708

Re: Lua functionality in Elmer

Hi,

thanks for this implementation!
I use Lua with ELMER since 3 weeks on Linux. So it works very well - no problems so far :)

Regards
Martin
by mb5
04 Sep 2018, 16:57
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Mortar - switch between strong and weak
Replies: 5
Views: 3791

Re: Mortar - switch between strong and weak

Hi,

thanks for your reply. I've tested your "ProjectorFlags" branch. For my case I can switch between strong and weak now. :)
Good to know about the key words. The ElmerSolver Manual doesn't know about "galerkin projector" or "level projector strong".

Regards
Martin
by mb5
03 Sep 2018, 09:21
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Mortar - switch between strong and weak
Replies: 5
Views: 3791

Re: Mortar - switch between strong and weak

Hi, thanks for your reply. I have an extruded mesh (along z-axis). For testing I use the "RotatingBCMagnetoDynamics" testcase from the ELMER sources which also have a extruded mesh. I've done the first simulation (strong) here with Level Projector Strong = Logical True Level Projector Plan...
by mb5
31 Aug 2018, 16:21
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Mortar - switch between strong and weak
Replies: 5
Views: 3791

Mortar - switch between strong and weak

Hi, I'm using the WhitneyAVSolver for a rotating electrical machine. For convergence tests I want to switch between strong and weak level projector. I've tested with the ELMER testcase "RotatingBCMagnetoDynamics". Boundary Condition 3 Target Boundaries(2) = 1 2 Name = "Mortar Inside&q...
by mb5
24 Aug 2018, 08:56
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: ElmerGrid: Strongly different number of elements in partition mesh
Replies: 4
Views: 3027

Re: ElmerGrid: Strongly different number of elements in partition mesh

Hi, I have no circuits in the model, only magnetization and current density. Hmm, I ran these benchmark at the same time. So there was cpu load on twenty cores (my machine have 40 cores + 40 Hyperthreading cores). Maybe I should repeat the benchmark. I will try to use my desktop computer with an oth...