Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for your reply,
I apply the heat source starting from the point (x0,y0,z0) so the laser beam is on face 11 and moves in the x direction which is the refined face.
Search found 26 matches
- 05 Apr 2017, 00:19
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Problem with modeling keyhole laser welding
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4458
- 03 Apr 2017, 16:17
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Problem with modeling keyhole laser welding
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4458
Re: Problem with modeling keyhole laser welding
This is working now, I changed the function for the heat source such that the spot size depends on z.
- 30 Mar 2017, 14:50
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Problem with modeling keyhole laser welding
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4458
Problem with modeling keyhole laser welding
Hi, I am trying to model keyhole mode laser welding but for some reason there only seems to be a pulse at the middle of the weld path and then the heat dissaptes soon after. This worked for a normal volumetric heat source but when I try to add anything that would make it resemble the heat disributio...
- 24 Mar 2017, 16:37
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Bent Waveguide VectorHelmholtz solver Tutorial
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4406
Re: Bent Waveguide VectorHelmholtz solver Tutorial
Hi thanks for your answer,
but how does equating the Electric robin coefficient yeild the primary and scattered fields to be waveguide modes?
but how does equating the Electric robin coefficient yeild the primary and scattered fields to be waveguide modes?
- 17 Mar 2017, 11:14
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Bent Waveguide VectorHelmholtz solver Tutorial
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4406
Re: Bent Waveguide VectorHelmholtz solver Tutorial
Does anyone know why it is like this? Any information will be helpful as I am still confused!
- 15 Mar 2017, 18:27
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Getting different results when running on Windows and Linux
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4351
Re: Getting different results when running on Windows and Linux
I thought any difference in the number was indication of a problem but since you have confirmed that it is ok I guess it's not a problem any more - Thank you for your help!
- 14 Mar 2017, 15:17
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Getting different results when running on Windows and Linux
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4351
Re: Getting different results when running on Windows and Linux
Thanks for your suggestion, I tried the following nigtly build: elmerfem-nightly_Windows-AMD64.zip
but it still doesn't match the output given by the Linux version and is the same as the old windows version.
I have attached the output and the data file produced by the new nightly build.
but it still doesn't match the output given by the Linux version and is the same as the old windows version.
I have attached the output and the data file produced by the new nightly build.
- 13 Mar 2017, 19:21
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Bent Waveguide VectorHelmholtz solver Tutorial
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4406
Bent Waveguide VectorHelmholtz solver Tutorial
Hi, I am working through the tutorial of the bent waveguide that uses the VectorHelholtz solver and am a little confused by the boundary condition values given to the boundaries, Why is the Electric Robin Coeffcient im for the output equal to $beta0? Because isn't the outport suppose to be assigned ...
- 13 Mar 2017, 18:23
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: complex propagation constant in VectorHelmholtzSolver
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2143
Re: complex propagation constant in VectorHelmholtzSolver
Hey, this is what I did but I'm no 100% sure it is right, so if anyone sees a mistake please correct me. For the wall I applied the Leontovich impedance boundary condition because since beta is complex it meants that the signal attentuates so the electric feild can't be zero. I followed what was in ...
- 10 Mar 2017, 13:52
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Getting different results when running on Windows and Linux
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4351
Re: Getting different results when running on Windows and Linux
Here are the remaining files